As the August 15, 2026, Osun governorship election draws near, stakeholders have reviewed a new assessment highlighting potential threats to a credible poll, while also raising concerns over preparedness for the governorship election in the state.
The stakeholders also recommended the need for closer coordination among themselves, with participants calling for strict adherence to existing peace agreements and responsible conduct by political actors.
The issues were outlined during a validation session convened by the Kukah Centre, where findings from its political, social, and security analysis were presented to a cross-section of participants.
Presenting the findings, the Research Manager at the Kukah Centre, Fatai Yusuf, stated that the political landscape in the state had become increasingly competitive.
“The 2026 election reflects a major political realignment, including the defection of the incumbent governor to a new party, reshaping alliances and increasing competition,” Yusuf said.
He explained that the contest was gradually taking the shape of a three-way race, noting that this development could heighten uncertainty and tension across the state.
Yusuf added, “Documented incidents include violence, injuries, and kidnappings across multiple local government areas, indicating potential flashpoints.”
Also speaking at the session, the Project Manager at the Kukah Centre, Asabe Ndahi, described the forthcoming election as significant beyond the state level.
“The 2026 gubernatorial election is more than a state-level exercise; it is a defining test of our collective commitment to democratic integrity and a precursor to the 2027 general elections,” she said.
Attendees drawn from the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), security agencies, political parties, and civil society groups examined risk factors capable of undermining the electoral process.
Participants collectively urged governments and those in positions of authority to prioritise preventive strategies, warning that unresolved institutional and political grievances often serve as triggers for electoral violence.